2015-11-24 21:55 GMT+01:00 Uwe Barthel <bart...@x-reizend.de>:

> > I've updated JXPATH to Java 7. There is a lot of work to update the code
> > base to use Java 7 languages features and APIs. I invite everybody to
> join
> > me hereā€¦
>
> Do you like to start these changes before or after the release 1.4?
> I prefer to create the release as soon as possible and start rework on
> that baseline.
>

I have already started to upgrade the code base.


>
> -- Uwe
>
>
> > On 24 Nov 2015, at 21:44, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > I've updated JXPATH to Java 7. There is a lot of work to update the code
> > base to use Java 7 languages features and APIs. I invite everybody to
> join
> > me here...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Benedikt
> >
> > 2015-11-22 19:28 GMT+01:00 Pascal Schumacher <pascalschumac...@gmx.net>:
> >
> >> If you pay Oracle for long term support you still get updates for Java
> 7.
> >>
> >> This means that there will be some people (like me at work :() which
> have
> >> to stick to Java 7 for some time.
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 22.11.2015 um 16:44 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> >>
> >>> On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Dave Brosius <dbros...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> As has java 7 reached end of life.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> FYI: I think IBM still supports their Java 7 IIRC
> >>>
> >>> Gayr
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On 11/22/2015 09:06 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm fine with Java 7, since Java 6 has already reached EOL.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2015-11-21 19:48 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'd go with Java 7.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Gary
> >>>>>> On Nov 21, 2015 3:50 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" <brit...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> any preference on which Java Version JXPath 1.4 target? Currently
> the
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> build
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> is set to 1.3. I've only Java 1.6, 1.7 1.8 and 1.9 installed on my
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> machine,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> so I won't be able to test with 1.3, 1.4 and 1.5. Further more I
> don't
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> see
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> a reason to keep support for such old Java versions.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>>>> Benedikt
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~britter/
> >>>>>>> http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
> >>>>>>> http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
> >>>>>>> http://github.com/britter
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://people.apache.org/~britter/
> > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
> > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
> > http://github.com/britter
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
http://people.apache.org/~britter/
http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
http://github.com/britter

Reply via email to