Phil: > I am not happy about proceeding, though, in the presence of the -1 > votes. We like to make decisions by consensus and while this is a > procedural decision and therefore subject to majority approval, I > would like to ask those who case negative votes to reconsider.
I have an counter proposal: how about addressing most of the concerns first: - merge the mavenisation cleanly, it is not asked too much to display it in master not gh-pages - add some samples to the readme - adopt commons codestyle If those 3 things are done by the submitters I personally would be very reliefed (I still would not see a case to use it myself, but at least we wont have any ground for the rockstar argument anymore). I am not sure about the "incubator" argument, as I understood it, it is not needed for IP clearance. And given the vote already passed you can just make the above clean-up in git(hub) and get it merged to the sandbox. gruss Bernd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
