On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 19:37:48 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
Here is a tally of the VOTE
Commons PMC:
+1 from Dave Brosius, Luc Maisonobe, Phil Steitz, Joerg Schaibl,
Oliver Heger, Gary Gregory, Niall Pemberton
+0 from BenediKt Ritter
-0 from
-1 from Emmanuel Bourg, Mark Thomas, James Carman
Others:
-1 from Uwe Barthel
This VOTE, therefore, passes.
I am not happy about proceeding, though, in the presence of the -1
votes. We like to make decisions by consensus and while this is a
procedural decision and therefore subject to majority approval, I
would like to ask those who case negative votes to reconsider. I
would also like to allow any others who have not registered an
opinion to chime in so we make the right decision.
Would it make it any easier if the transfer were to an existing
component? ["Commons-Lang" seems quite appropriate.]
Regards,
Gilles
Thanks,
Phil
On 10/29/15 5:42 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
This is a VOTE to accept the code discussed in [1] and available for
review using the git commands below. All are welcome to vote, votes
from PMC members are binding. Assuming a positive vote, we will
execute a software grant with the authors and use the code as the
basis for a new Commons Sandbox component.
This VOTE will close in 72 hours. More discussion on the code and
its fit in Commons is always welcome, but please do not reply to
this thread with discussion, other than embedded justification for
negative VOTES. Use the thread from [1] instead.
Git commands to grab the code:
git clone [email protected]:NormanShapiro/Naomi.git
git checkout gh-pages
Thanks!
Phil
[1] http://markmail.org/message/imoi5aipf63f7rsa
[ ] +1 Yes!
[ ] +0 OK...
[ ] -0 OK, but...
[ ] -1 We should not do this, because...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
