On 10/2/15 12:08 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Well, a champion can volunteer to shepherd this through our incubator I > suppose,
OK, I will volunteer to do this. I propose that we start this as a Commons Sandbox project. To do that, we need a VOTE to accept the code, a software grant and the IP clearance form [1] submitted to the Incubator PMC. We can use either git or svn for the new sandbox repo. Any objections? Any preference for git or svn? Phil [1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html > like CommonsRDF, which seems pretty inactive ATM. There is also > the issue of "donate and forget" vs. staying plugged in the community. > > I just do not have the extra FOSS cycles to dig into the code ATM to see > what's under the hood. > > Gary > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 10/2/15 11:46 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> I do not have time to dig into this one ATM but I'd like to give my 2c. >>> >>> Does this project introduce a new RE-like language or is it an API >> wrapper >>> for REs? It sounds like it is both. >> It looks to me like what it says it is, which is an alternative to >> REs, which IMO is a nice idea. Less "pattern matching language" and >> more objects expressing matching intent. End result is less >> developer thought required to accomplish a common task. Seems to >> fit nicely in Commons to me. >> >> Phil >>> A project like this I could see in Commons if the project was split into >> an >>> API module and modules for different pattern matching languages, where >> the >>> standard Java RE would be the reference example. Naomi (I love the name >>> BTW, someones wife or daughter?) would be another implementation module. >>> With both under its belt, the project would be on fairly solid footing >>> (granted I do not know Naomi). You could even imaging implementations >> that >>> would accept a JXPath or a SQL WHERE clause. >>> >>> If the project is only meant to introduce a new RE-like language, then a >>> TLP would be probably more appropriate. >>> >>> 2c, >>> Gary >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 9/29/15 3:55 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >>>>>> Norman, >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello and welcome to Apache Commons. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's not clear to me why Naomi is better than regular expressions. >>>>> Pointing >>>>>> to Javadocs is not the best way to get traction. >>>>>> >>>>>> Your project would be better served by having some documentation on >>>> your >>>>>> front page with an example driven tutorial. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is Naomi faster than REs? >>>>>> >>>>>> What can I do in Naomi that REs can't do? And vice-versa. >>>>>> >>>>>> Examples of this on your front page would help you at least get folks >>>> to >>>>>> consider learning a brand new way of doing things... >>>>> +1 >>>>> The code in SimpleExamples starts to get to this. Looks interesting >>>>> and powerful. Either here or on the github readme you should take a >>>>> stab at explaining a little more how hard problems using regex get >>>>> easier with naomi, illustrated with some simple examples. Then >>>>> maybe with help from community members here, you can develop some >>>>> overview / getting started docs that help people get into the code. >>>>> >>>> +1. >>>> >>>> Reading SimpleExamples, my summary would be a boilerplate description of >>>> "It replaces the arcane regular expression language with an API". It >>>> reminds me of command line argument parsers. Perl had/has a great >> regular >>>> expression like command line argument parser, but it was cryptic and you >>>> either loved it or hated it. Then along came Commons CLI, args4j and all >>>> the others, providing a more OO/procedural API instead of its own mini >>>> language. Not as 'powerful' (in that you had to type more), but simpler >> (in >>>> that you didn't have to learn a new lingo and didn't have to juggle >>>> multiple languages inside one context (a source file)). >>>> >>>> I definitely need that user manual. It's hard, with a brain trained on >>>> regular expressions, to read 'Pattern greek3=new >> CharSequencePattern("?")' >>>> and realize (I think) that it means a literal ? character. It's also the >>>> primary way it'll be successful. You need that educational path that >>>> explains what a ExplicitCharClass is for, rather than randomly clicking >> on >>>> javadoc :) >>>> >>>> There'll also be much debate to be had I suspect. Is "a-e" too complex, >>>> compared to "abcde" or "a","e". Which parts of regex are worth >> supporting, >>>> vs not. Can I mix bits of regexp with bits of Naomi? new >>>> ExplicitCharClass("a-eg-p"). >>>> >>>> Random.... I'd like the idea of varargs for automatic and'ing. ie: >>>> >>>> new ExplicitCharClass("a-p", "!f") [and is a not char class too >>>> complex?]. >>>> >>>> Continuing on my summary, as I peruse the code a little more, I'd go >> with: >>>> "Build a regular expression via an API, not an arcane language of its >> own". >>>> I'd love to see that grow to: >>>> >>>> "Express regular expressions as objects, or mix and match objects with >> that >>>> arcane mini language we all love or loathe". >>>> >>>> Hen >>>> >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
