On 19 September 2015 at 13:33, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 19 September 2015 at 12:58, Kristian Rosenvold <krosenv...@apache.org> > wrote: >> Just to be clear on this, the breach is adding an interface to >> >> org.apache.commons.io.input.TailerListener#endOfFileReached >> and will probably only affect a few users. I'm documenting this in >> release notes. > > This is binary compatible; it will only affect users who have written > classes implementing the interface.
... who will have to update their source and recompile. > >> Personally I'd say this is 2.5 simply due to its very limited impact, > > +1 > >> but version numbers are cheap :) >> >> Kristian >> >> >> >> 2015-09-19 12:32 GMT+02:00 Kristian Rosenvold <krosenv...@apache.org>: >>> The next release is binary compatible except for *1* method that has >>> been added to a (fairly infrequently used) interface. Does that still >>> mean I should burn 2.5 and go for 3.0. And would that be 3.0 or 3.0.0 >>> ? >>> >>> Kristian >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
