On 19 September 2015 at 12:58, Kristian Rosenvold <krosenv...@apache.org> wrote: > Just to be clear on this, the breach is adding an interface to > > org.apache.commons.io.input.TailerListener#endOfFileReached > and will probably only affect a few users. I'm documenting this in > release notes.
This is binary compatible; it will only affect users who have written classes implementing the interface. > Personally I'd say this is 2.5 simply due to its very limited impact, +1 > but version numbers are cheap :) > > Kristian > > > > 2015-09-19 12:32 GMT+02:00 Kristian Rosenvold <krosenv...@apache.org>: >> The next release is binary compatible except for *1* method that has >> been added to a (fairly infrequently used) interface. Does that still >> mean I should burn 2.5 and go for 3.0. And would that be 3.0 or 3.0.0 >> ? >> >> Kristian > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
