2015-05-25 8:07 GMT+02:00 Bruno P. Kinoshita <brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br>:
> Thanks for clarifying Niall. > > I'll try to fix the tests, and will try to generate the Maven site and the > tags documentation. > Probably I'll update the commons-parent version in the pom.xml, and will > use the new bootstrap style too - which is already used by other commons > components. > > Once that's done I'll post to the mailing list proposing to merge the > branch into trunk. > What do you think? > Go for it! Great to see some action in jelly! > Bruno > > > From: Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>; Bruno P. Kinoshita > <brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br> > Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 7:41 AM > Subject: Re: [jelly] Working on some old issues > > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Bruno P. Kinoshita < > brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br> wrote: > > > Hi Nial > > Do you know why your branch wasn't merged? > > > I dont really remember. I'm not sure whether all issues were resolved > (perhaps around tags doc generation). I sent the following email at the > start of 2010 - but I did some more work after that email: > * http://markmail.org/message/yveew57uparj3aab > > I think the main reason though was that jelly was petty dormant and there > was no real interest. > > Niall > > > > > > I've checked it out and a few tests are failing with Maven 3.2.5 and Java > > 7 & 8. But I'd like to use your branch, try to fix any failing tests and > > merge back onto trunk. > > Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-291 to track this > > issue. > > Thanks!Bruno > > > > > > From: Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> > > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> > > Cc: Bruno P. Kinoshita <brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br> > > Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 3:36 AM > > Subject: Re: [jelly] Working on some old issues > > > > On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 3:19 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I think the first job is to ensure that the build works with Maven2/3, > > > having tidied up the layout to conform with Maven2/3 conventions > > > (src/test/java and src/main/java etc). > > > > > > > I worked on a maven branch back in 2010 here: > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jelly/branches/MAVEN-2-BRANCH > > > > Niall > > > > > > > > > > > > > I see that a start has been made, but it looks like there is some way > to > > > go yet. > > > > > > On 10 May 2015 at 10:48, Bruno P. Kinoshita < > brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br> > > > wrote: > > > > Hi Paul > > > >> if I remember well how the patches of Kohsuke landed, I remember I > was > > > > unable to apply them because they seemed to be breaking some of the > > > > "standard command-line jelly". I think I remember that a pluggeable > > > > context was discussed but, maybe, was not developed. > > > > Any kind of background on old issues is welcome! Before I start to > work > > > on any issue, > > > > I'll triage old issues, try to find some low hanging fruits, and then > > > will start a one or two dayresearch on the mailing list to see if I can > > > learn as much as possible before coding. > > > >>I have not been able to save cycles to address more issues of Jelly > and > > > > I know of some other folks, fellows in research in learning > technology, > > > > that were, looking forward to getting more releases of jelly at the > > time > > > > I met them. > > > > > > > > I will work a little bit every weekend on triage issues, but will > have > > a > > > one or two week cyclein the middle of June and in July (lovely weather > > for > > > coding; cold, cloudy, and raining a lot :) > > > > > > > >>Hope it helps. > > > >>I am happy to help you if I can towards making it better. > > > > > > > > It definitely helps. Very happy for having someone I can ask > questions > > > about some old issuesin [jelly] :) > > > > ThanksBruno > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Paul Libbrecht <p...@hoplahup.net> > > > > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> > > > > Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2015 8:33 AM > > > > Subject: Re: [jelly] Working on some old issues > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1/05/15 10:22, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote: > > > >> Since I joined Commons I've had a special interest in [jelly] due to > > > its importance in the Jenkins project. > > > >> > > > >> Jenkins uses a patched version of [jelly]. Kohsuke, creator of > > Jenkins, > > > is/was a Commons committer too, and submitted some issues. I intend to > > > investigate if that'd be doable fix the issues to a point that Jenkins > > can > > > drop the patched version, and [jelly] can be updated and released > again. > > > > > > > > Hello Bruno, > > > > > > > > if I remember well how the patches of Kohsuke landed, I remember I > was > > > > unable to apply them because they seemed to be breaking some of the > > > > "standard command-line jelly". I think I remember that a pluggeable > > > > context was discussed but, maybe, was not developed. > > > > > > > > Thus, I can only encourage you to go ahead. I think it would be nice > to > > > > have both worlds working well with a single code base. > > > > > > > > I have not been able to save cycles to address more issues of Jelly > and > > > > I know of some other folks, fellows in research in learning > technology, > > > > that were, looking forward to getting more releases of jelly at the > > time > > > > I met them. > > > > > > > > Hope it helps. > > > > I am happy to help you if I can towards making it better. > > > > > > > > paul > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- http://people.apache.org/~britter/ http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter http://github.com/britter
