On 5/3/15 12:26 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 5/3/15 11:56 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: >>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> we're discussing our first incubating release, and we came to the issue >>>> that we are not grant with permissions to deploy maven artifacts to the >>>> org.apache.commons groupId [1]. >>> Why org.apache.commons, and not, say, org.apache.commons.rdf? The >>> former seems overly broad to me. >> Could be we should have gone that way years ago when we moved to >> org.apache.commons:commons-foo; but that ship has sailed, so I think >> its best to stay consistent with the rest of the components and >> proceed as proposed. > > First release, and the ship has sailed? Sorry, but I don't think so.
What I meant was the decision to standardize on GroupId: org.apache.commons ArtifactId: commons-foo[v] I am -1 for making new components different. Phil > > Jochen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
