On 5/3/15 12:26 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 5/3/15 11:56 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> we're discussing our first incubating release, and we came to the issue
>>>> that we are not grant with permissions to deploy maven artifacts to the
>>>> org.apache.commons groupId [1].
>>> Why org.apache.commons, and not, say, org.apache.commons.rdf? The
>>> former seems overly broad to me.
>> Could be we should have gone that way years ago when we moved to
>> org.apache.commons:commons-foo; but that ship has sailed, so I think
>> its best to stay consistent with the rest of the components and
>> proceed as proposed.
>
> First release, and the ship has sailed? Sorry, but I don't think so.

What I meant was the decision to standardize on

GroupId: org.apache.commons
ArtifactId: commons-foo[v]

I am -1 for making new components different.

Phil
>
> Jochen
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to