Ok, thanks. The part I wasn't sure about is if that was the only breaking change. It sounds like you're saying the other changes aren't breaking.
-Ben On Feb 22, 2015 11:14 PM, "Emmanuel Bourg" <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: > Le 23/02/2015 05:39, Ben McCann a écrit : > > > Are many of your changes breaking backward compatibility? I'm wondering > if > > there are only a few that do if we could prioritize them in order to get > a > > 6.0 release out with the rest of the changes coming in a 6.1. > > Hi Ben, > > I think we already answered this question, BCEL-209 is a breaking change > because it affects the public API. Your help resolving this issue would > be welcome. We have to understand why the current design was chosen and > if the design proposed by Mark may cause any issue later. > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
