Le 23/02/2015 05:39, Ben McCann a écrit : > Are many of your changes breaking backward compatibility? I'm wondering if > there are only a few that do if we could prioritize them in order to get a > 6.0 release out with the rest of the changes coming in a 6.1.
Hi Ben, I think we already answered this question, BCEL-209 is a breaking change because it affects the public API. Your help resolving this issue would be welcome. We have to understand why the current design was chosen and if the design proposed by Mark may cause any issue later. Emmanuel Bourg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
