Am Mon, 22 Dec 2014 22:29:34 +0000 schrieb sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: > But if we always use the same symbolic name, it may look as though an > app that was built using VFS2.0 will just be able to use VFS19.2 > without any adjustments. > However, that may not be the case.
Actually in OSGi a new major number means that it is not the case. And unlike normal Java it is perfectly fine to have two versions of a java package with the same name and different context (thats why renaming packages does not fit the OSGi model very well, but I guess it is better to support normal java classloaders (by renaming). But you are right, it should not harm to stay at the same name (and actually it is more expected), so best we keep it for 2.1 and not "fix" it. Gruss Bernd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
