On 22 December 2014 at 20:59, Bernd Eckenfels <e...@zusammenkunft.net> wrote: > Hello, > > in commons-math I see the comment, that the OSGi bundle-symbolic name > should be aligned with the package name (i.e. major version). > > For VFS2 this is currently not the case. I can see multiple solutions > for 2.1: > > a) follow the math lead and make it org.apache.commons.vfs2 (asuming > this does not break anything from 2.0 to 2.1)
If the OSGi bundle name relates to the Java package name or the Maven coordinates then this might break things. > b) keep it at org.apache.commons.vfs because we cannot do this change > in 2.1, but make sure that the 3.0 release uses vfs3 > > c) keep the symbolic name the same, even across major versions, as this > makes it much easier for osgi range selection. (my preference). What is the OSGi name actually used for? > As you normally would only use import/export versions for packages and > there is no problem in havng multiple versions of the same symbolic > name, I think the c) option is ma favorite (it also avoids the problem > of changing the name in a minor update). > > Gruss > Bernd > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
