If it's not done properly, why bother with a VOTE at all? On 19 December 2014 at 00:51, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: > Le 19/12/2014 01:08, sebb a écrit : > >> The VOTE email should include all the information needed to validate a >> release. > > You are right but this is exactly the kind of hassle that makes release > management tedious and discourages people from publishing releases. At > some point a balance has to be found between the expectations, and I > think publishing new releases is more important than posting a VOTE mail > with an encyclopedic precision. > > IMHO Luc provided enough information to review the release properly. > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
