It's still not clear to me what your goal is though as you did not answer
my question... ;-)

Gary

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Well playing with SVN is fine a moment but some projects start to
> depend on SNAPSHOT and it can last forever (typically the case for
> TomEE since some weeks to not say more).
>
> I'll cancel the vote today, not sure I'll be able to reroll it this
> month so if anyone has some cycles and will of doing it please do
> otherwise i'll try next month surely.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-11-17 18:24 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>:
> > I see several paths for you.
> >
> > First, cancel the VOTE thread.
> >
> > Second, decide if you want to tell people to grab the latest from SVN and
> > experiment or release an Alpha or Beta. If you want a release, go through
> > the process again...
> >
> > Then publicize the availability of the code in SVN or a release to the
> ML,
> > twitter and so on.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Basically I just want to release to let people grap it but I don't
> >> want to prevent some API changes (so not yet a 2.0). Switched to a RC1
> >> cause of all these commons release links.
> >>
> >>
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> @rmannibucau
> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>
> >>
> >> 2014-11-17 18:16 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>:
> >> > Let's step back here.
> >> >
> >> > Do you want to release an Alpha or Beta? As opposed to a telling
> people
> >> to
> >> > try out what is in the HEAD of trunk?
> >> >
> >> > If you do release 2.0, the implications are strict as to what API
> changes
> >> > are allowed WRT binary compatibility.
> >> >
> >> > If so you can do that if the JCS community agrees. Instead of
> releasing
> >> > 2.0, you would release a version 2.0-Beta1, for which you'd have a
> first
> >> > tag of 2.0-Beta1-RC1 to VOTE on.
> >> >
> >> > Gary
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >> rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> basically that's not what we (I maybe?) wanted to do. this was really
> >> >> a RC (I even wanted to call it beta). So version is correct from this
> >> >> point of view. I sadly didn't notice it was "conflicting" with
> commons
> >> >> habits.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> >> @rmannibucau
> >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> 2014-11-17 18:05 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>:
> >> >> > No, the release candidate tag and project version should not match
> >> >> exactly.
> >> >> > The tag is a release candidate. What we are voting to produce is
> >> version
> >> >> > 2.0, so whatever the tag points to should build version 2.0, not
> >> 2.0-RC1,
> >> >> > not a snapshot, just 2.0. We can have any number of tags 2.0-RC1,
> 2, 3
> >> >> and
> >> >> > so on, but they all should attempt to build 2.0. The next tag will
> be
> >> >> > 2.0-RC2.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The links I provided show the steps more or less clearly. Yes, I
> know
> >> our
> >> >> > release process is complicated but that's all we've got... :-( You
> do
> >> get
> >> >> > the hang of it after a while, but I still make mistakes all the
> time
> >> if
> >> >> > that makes you feel better! ;-)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Gary
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >> >> rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> @Gary: wdym? rc version is RC1 so it matches project version
> finally.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> >> >> @rmannibucau
> >> >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >> >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 2014-11-17 17:38 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>:
> >> >> >> > -1
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > The files at the tag are incorrect, least the POM is wrong:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/tags/commons-jcs-2.0-RC1/pom.xml
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > because the project version is 2.0-RC1 instead of 2.0.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > I've not found one cannonical receipt for releasing out of
> commons
> >> >> >> sadly, I
> >> >> >> > use both
> >> >> >> > - https://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus and
> >> >> >> > - https://commons.apache.org/releases/index.html
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Gary
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 4:23 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >> >> >> rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> Hi
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> I'm trying to align on commons standards this time.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> - here is the maven repo:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1061/
> >> >> >> >> - assemblies can be found here
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1061/org/apache/commons/commons-jcs-dist/2.0-RC1/
> >> >> >> >> (I didn't copy them in another place since I guess it is ok to
> use
> >> >> >> >> nexus for it)
> >> >> >> >> - tag is here:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/tags/commons-jcs-2.0-RC1/
> >> >> >> >> - Site staging is:
> >> >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/commons-jcs-2.0-RC1/
> >> >> >> >> - rat report is:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/commons-jcs-2.0-RC1/rat-report.html
> >> >> >> >> - KEYS:  https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> >> >> >> >> This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now or until
> we
> >> get
> >> >> >> >> 3 PMC votes.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> >> >> >> >> [ ] +-0 OK, but...
> >> >> >> >> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Thanks guys and sorry for all my learning steps,
> >> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> >> >> >> @rmannibucau
> >> >> >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> >> >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >> >> >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >> >> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > --
> >> >> >> > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> >> >> >> > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> >> >> >> > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> >> >> >> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <
> http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> >> >> >> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> >> >> >> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> >> >> >> > Home: http://garygregory.com/
> >> >> >> > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> >> >> > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> >> >> > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> >> >> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> >> >> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> >> >> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> >> >> > Home: http://garygregory.com/
> >> >> > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >> >>
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> >> > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> >> > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> >> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> >> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> >> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> >> > Home: http://garygregory.com/
> >> > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> > Home: http://garygregory.com/
> > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to