Hi Giles,

Am 24.07.2014 19:35, schrieb Gilles:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 08:17:11 -0700, James Ring wrote:
>> You should do git commit <filename> or git commit -a to commit all
>> unstaged
>> files.
> 
> I did "git commit -a"
> 
> Then I tried to commit to the subversion repository:
> 
> $ git svn dcommit
> Unable to determine upstream SVN information from HEAD history.
> Perhaps the repository is empty. at /usr/lib/git-core/git-svn line 856.

after cloning the git repository, you have to connect it to the svn
server. There is a short description how to do the setup at [1] in the
section "Git for Apache committers".

Oliver

[1] http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache

> 
> Gilles
> 
> 
>> On Jul 24, 2014 3:36 AM, "Gilles" <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:12:38 +0200, luc wrote:
>>>
>>>> Le 2014-07-23 23:58, Gilles a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 08:36:55 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 23/07/2014 00:05, Gilles a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:01:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Looks like other projects are running VOTEs to ensure there is
>>>>>>>> consensus for this action and including references to VOTE threads
>>>>>>>> in INFRA JIRAs.  Lets do this.  The action I am proposing is
>>>>>>>> that we
>>>>>>>> request a new ASF git repo, make the current svn repo read-only
>>>>>>>> (adding a README to make it clear) and change github mirroring to
>>>>>>>> use the git repo.   Votes, please.  This vote will close in 72
>>>>>>>> hours.  Note that this VOTE applies only to [math], i.e.
>>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math.
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 go for it
>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 OK, but...
>>>>>>>> [ ] -0  Not happy about this, because...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   [X] -1 We should not do this if that means that I have to know how
>>>>>>>          to use "git" within the next 72 hours.
>>>>>>> Please clarify the migration planning, including the necessary
>>>>>>> transition
>>>>>>> for complete newbies (e.g. a summary of how to perform the
>>>>>>> equivalent
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> such basic tasks as "svn co", "svn add", svn del", "svn commit",
>>>>>>> "svn diff").
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is an extensive tutorial for git as the Git book:
>>>>>> <http://www.git-scm.com/book>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For a quick reference, here is a cheet sheet for subversion users:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  <http://www.git-tower.com/blog/git-for-subversion-users-
>>>>>> cheat-sheet-detail/>
>>>>>> For an even quicker reference on the most used commands, here is
>>>>>> a mapping :
>>>>>> Concerning the other commands, here are some hints:
>>>>>> svn co      --->  git clone
>>>>>>  svn add     --->  git add
>>>>>>  svn rm      --->  git rm
>>>>>>  svn commit  --->  git commit, then git push (rationale explained
>>>>>> below)
>>>>>>  svn diff    --->  git diff
>>>>>>  svn update  --->  git pull
>>>>>> From my own experience, the first thing to understand for the
>>>>>> difference
>>>>>> between subversion and git is that in the later there is a separation
>>>>>> between "committing" a change, and "pushing" it to the reference
>>>>>> remote
>>>>>> repository. The reason this is a two-stage process in git is that
>>>>>> there
>>>>>> are many different repositories and when you "commit" you do it on
>>>>>> your
>>>>>> local repository, which is on your own hard drive. So after this
>>>>>> first
>>>>>> step, the only person who can see the change is the one who can
>>>>>> see this
>>>>>> local repository: you. If you want other people to see your
>>>>>> change, you
>>>>>> have to perform the second step and "push" your repository to a
>>>>>> reference one shared with other developers (i.e. in our case the
>>>>>> one on
>>>>>> Apache infrastructure). This difference seems at first cumbersome
>>>>>> for a
>>>>>> subversion user, and at the beginning we always forget to push and
>>>>>> don't
>>>>>> understand why people do not see our commits. After some time, it
>>>>>> appears really a good thing, as it allows to work locally using full
>>>>>> source code versioning features without any risk of breaking
>>>>>> things on
>>>>>> the main shared repository.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, Luc.
>>>>> If I could just ask:
>>>>> * What are the actual command(s) to create a Commons Math local
>>>>> repository?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From the command line, using the current read-only version of the
>>>> repository, this would be :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   git clone http://git.apache.org/commons-math.git
>>>>
>>>> From this, you would be able to do local commits (since you have now
>>>> a local repository,
>>>> which is a full-fledge repository, you can commit in it). However,
>>>> you cannot push to
>>>> the remote Apache repository afterwards since it is read-only.
>>>>
>>>>  * Did I understand correctly that we can already interact with the svn
>>>>>   repository, using a local git repository?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes. This is what I have done for the last one or two years with
>>>> Apace Commons Math.
>>>> There is an extension to git named git-svn that set up a bridge
>>>> between the two systems:
>>>> the remote repository is the svn server, and locally you can have a
>>>> git repository. So
>>>> from the client side you do your commits using git commands, and when
>>>> you want to push
>>>> them the bridge uses svn protocol to communicate with the remote svn
>>>> server. The server is
>>>> not aware you are not using svn locally.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Clone created; I modified the "doc/release/release.howto.txt" file and
>>> tried to commit with the following two commands:
>>>
>>> -----
>>> $ git commit
>>> On branch trunk
>>> Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/trunk'.
>>>
>>> Changes not staged for commit:
>>>         modified:   doc/release/release.howto.txt
>>>
>>> Untracked files:
>>>         doc/release/release.howto.txt~
>>>
>>> no changes added to commit
>>> $ git svn dcommit
>>> doc/release/release.howto.txt: needs update
>>> update-index --refresh: command returned error: 1
>>> -----
>>>
>>> What's the problem(s)?
>>>
>>> Are there git configurations ready for Commons Math that e.g. will
>>> ignore backup files (to avoid the above verbose output), will set
>>> the the "keys" ("$Id") and "properties"?
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Gilles
>>>
>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to