On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 08:17:11 -0700, James Ring wrote:
You should do git commit <filename> or git commit -a to commit all unstaged
files.

I did "git commit -a"

Then I tried to commit to the subversion repository:

$ git svn dcommit
Unable to determine upstream SVN information from HEAD history.
Perhaps the repository is empty. at /usr/lib/git-core/git-svn line 856.

Gilles


On Jul 24, 2014 3:36 AM, "Gilles" <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:

On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:12:38 +0200, luc wrote:

Le 2014-07-23 23:58, Gilles a écrit :

On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 08:36:55 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote:

Le 23/07/2014 00:05, Gilles a écrit :

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:01:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:

Looks like other projects are running VOTEs to ensure there is
consensus for this action and including references to VOTE threads in INFRA JIRAs. Lets do this. The action I am proposing is that we
request a new ASF git repo, make the current svn repo read-only
(adding a README to make it clear) and change github mirroring to
use the git repo.   Votes, please.  This vote will close in 72
hours.  Note that this VOTE applies only to [math], i.e.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math.
[ ] +1 go for it
[ ] +0 OK, but...
[ ] -0  Not happy about this, because...

[X] -1 We should not do this if that means that I have to know how
         to use "git" within the next 72 hours.
Please clarify the migration planning, including the necessary
transition
for complete newbies (e.g. a summary of how to perform the equivalent
of
such basic tasks as "svn co", "svn add", svn del", "svn commit",
"svn diff").

There is an extensive tutorial for git as the Git book:
<http://www.git-scm.com/book>

For a quick reference, here is a cheet sheet for subversion users:

 <http://www.git-tower.com/blog/git-for-subversion-users-
cheat-sheet-detail/>
For an even quicker reference on the most used commands, here is
a mapping :
Concerning the other commands, here are some hints:
svn co      --->  git clone
 svn add     --->  git add
 svn rm      --->  git rm
svn commit ---> git commit, then git push (rationale explained below)
 svn diff    --->  git diff
 svn update  --->  git pull
From my own experience, the first thing to understand for the difference between subversion and git is that in the later there is a separation between "committing" a change, and "pushing" it to the reference remote repository. The reason this is a two-stage process in git is that there are many different repositories and when you "commit" you do it on your local repository, which is on your own hard drive. So after this first step, the only person who can see the change is the one who can see this local repository: you. If you want other people to see your change, you
have to perform the second step and "push" your repository to a
reference one shared with other developers (i.e. in our case the one on Apache infrastructure). This difference seems at first cumbersome for a subversion user, and at the beginning we always forget to push and don't
understand why people do not see our commits. After some time, it
appears really a good thing, as it allows to work locally using full source code versioning features without any risk of breaking things on
the main shared repository.

Thanks, Luc.
If I could just ask:
* What are the actual command(s) to create a Commons Math local
repository?


From the command line, using the current read-only version of the
repository, this would be :


  git clone http://git.apache.org/commons-math.git

From this, you would be able to do local commits (since you have now
a local repository,
which is a full-fledge repository, you can commit in it). However,
you cannot push to
the remote Apache repository afterwards since it is read-only.

* Did I understand correctly that we can already interact with the svn
  repository, using a local git repository?


Yes. This is what I have done for the last one or two years with
Apace Commons Math.
There is an extension to git named git-svn that set up a bridge
between the two systems:
the remote repository is the svn server, and locally you can have a
git repository. So
from the client side you do your commits using git commands, and when
you want to push
them the bridge uses svn protocol to communicate with the remote svn
server. The server is
not aware you are not using svn locally.


Clone created; I modified the "doc/release/release.howto.txt" file and
tried to commit with the following two commands:

-----
$ git commit
On branch trunk
Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/trunk'.

Changes not staged for commit:
        modified:   doc/release/release.howto.txt

Untracked files:
        doc/release/release.howto.txt~

no changes added to commit
$ git svn dcommit
doc/release/release.howto.txt: needs update
update-index --refresh: command returned error: 1
-----

What's the problem(s)?

Are there git configurations ready for Commons Math that e.g. will
ignore backup files (to avoid the above verbose output), will set
the the "keys" ("$Id") and "properties"?


Best,
Gilles


[...]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to