Am 01.03.2014 18:37, schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > Hi Simo, > > this is a nice idea, and I think it's doable for parts of the API. The > problem is, that it may require a lot of work and I don't see anybody who > has the time to do this currently :-) But if you jump into this, I think I > can help out here and there when I find the time. > > Regards, > Benedikt >
I am not sure about this, also because of the energy required to make the port happen. Wouldn't it be better to put this energy directly into BU2? BU has many flaws and keeping it alive artificially is maybe not the best option. Oliver > > 2014-03-01 13:04 GMT+01:00 Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>: > >> Hi all mates, >> >> even if in a stealth mode, I still lurk the ML - unfortunately my recent >> task at $work didn't let me so much energies/spare time for my hobbies >> projects. >> >> I really feel sorry for the abandoned status of BU2 but I just had the idea >> to port, in a separate package, the fluent APIs to BU and wrapping the >> existing BU classes. >> WDYT? Is there any objection on that? >> >> It should be good IMHO to >> >> * provide a new, different, tool to our BU users; >> >> * simplify the migration to BU2, when ready in the future. >> >> WDYT? >> All the best and have a nice weekend! >> -Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
