Hi Simo, this is a nice idea, and I think it's doable for parts of the API. The problem is, that it may require a lot of work and I don't see anybody who has the time to do this currently :-) But if you jump into this, I think I can help out here and there when I find the time.
Regards, Benedikt 2014-03-01 13:04 GMT+01:00 Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>: > Hi all mates, > > even if in a stealth mode, I still lurk the ML - unfortunately my recent > task at $work didn't let me so much energies/spare time for my hobbies > projects. > > I really feel sorry for the abandoned status of BU2 but I just had the idea > to port, in a separate package, the fluent APIs to BU and wrapping the > existing BU classes. > WDYT? Is there any objection on that? > > It should be good IMHO to > > * provide a new, different, tool to our BU users; > > * simplify the migration to BU2, when ready in the future. > > WDYT? > All the best and have a nice weekend! > -Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > -- http://people.apache.org/~britter/ http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter http://github.com/britter
