On 2 January 2014 14:54, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's a constant problem. There is not much use having a SNAPSHOT site IMO,
> but it is the default behavior so to speak.

That depends on the RM.

It's perfectly possible to deploy the website from the tag instead of trunk.

> Gary
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Duncan Jones <dun...@wortharead.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The top of the commons-lang web page reads:
>>
>> "Last Published: 01 January 2014  | Version: 3.3-SNAPSHOT "
>>
>> Shouldn't that read:
>>
>> "Last Published: 01 January 2014  | Version: 3.2 " ??
>>
>> Or are we changing the site between releases, thus necessitating that
>> we build a site using the current (snapshot) version number?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Duncan
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second 
> Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to