Hey Gilles
2013/12/31 Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> > On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 13:33:23 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> On 12/29/13, 6:39 AM, Gilles wrote: >> >>> Hello. >>> >>> Is there some framework in place in order to generate executable >>> files >>> from the Java sources located there? >>> I guess that a configuration snippet could be added in the >>> "pom.xml"[1] >>> so that one of the build phases can also compile (and perhaps also >>> run) >>> the example applications. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Gilles >>> >>> [1] I tried to use the "pom.xml" located in "src/userguide" but it >>> "failed >>> to resolve artefact" >>> org.apache.commons:commons-math3:jar:3.3-SNAPSHOT. >>> >> >> You need to install the [math] snapshot locally for maven to be able >> to resolve it. Run "mvn install" to get a current snapshot >> installed locally. >> > > OK. That's easy enough for me at the moment. > [I just wanted to check that what I put under "src/userguide/java" > does compile and run.] > However, I wonder why it is deemed better to have another "pom.xml" > rather than have the main one generate the "examples" JAR. > Have a look here [1]. Bottom line is, that creating multiple artifacts from one class path violates one of the core concepts of maven: modularity. HTH Benedikt [1] http://blog.sonatype.com/2010/01/how-to-create-two-jars-from-one-project-and-why-you-shouldnt/#.UsKy2XkiOgk > > > Thanks, > Gilles > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- http://people.apache.org/~britter/ http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter http://github.com/britter
