On 02/11/2013 22:41, Phil Steitz wrote: > 0) We forgot to specify required JDK level anywhere. Fixed in > trunk. If you regenerate release notes, this will be fixed.
Will do. Thanks. > 1) The Ant build is broken due to cglib dependency. We should > either dump the Ant build or fix it. I don't have time to fix it > right now, but will try to get to it this weekend if no one beats me > to it. It is only broken if you don't add cglib to the class path. We could go down a Tomact-like route and add download targets and the like but I'm happy with requiring that the class path needs to be set. I'll add some documentation. > 2) I can't seem to find your signing key. Odd. > Is this a new one? No. > Have you put it in /dist/commons/KEYS I thought I had. Obviously not. I'll add it now. > 3) The class diagrams and a lot of other stuff in the site still > needs updating. Not a release showstopper; but might be best to > just dump this stuff for now. I will go after this after 1). That looks suspiciously like the output from Rational Rose (or whatever it might be called these days). If we are going to include UML diagrams they really should be generated with a tool we can access at zero cost. I haven't gone looking for UML tools in a long time. Does anyone have some suggestions? I'll dump them for now. > I am having some trouble with the Ubuntu vm that I use to test JDK > 1.6. I will try to get this running so I can test on 1.6. All of > my testing up to now has been on 1.7. We should make sure > everything builds and runs OK on 1.6. Has anyone tested on 1.6? Yes. Jörg has covered that very well. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org