On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>wrote:
> 2013/10/22 sebb <seb...@gmail.com> > > > On 22 October 2013 19:40, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Anyone know what the point of the JIRA report is? > > > > > > It seems to be much like the changes report, but with less active > > > authorship and a confusing inclusion of resolved issues for different > > > versions. > > > > > > I'm wondering why we include it. > > > > The changes report only includes changes for the current version. > > > > The JIRA report includes changes for multiple versions; provided that > > the sort mode is correct - and provided that the JIRA fix versions are > > set up correctly - it would be more useful than just the changes > > report. > > > > It just duplicates what we have in the release notes. And since the site > can change anytime, I'm not giving to much about the reports at all (after > the release vote). But that's a different issue. > > Agreed on both issues :) Sebb points out that JIRA report has more info, but given its an out of date version of JIRA itself, I'm not seeing why we would want the JIRA report (even more so than the others). Any reason to keep it turned on for Commons? Hen
