On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Benedikt Ritter <benerit...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi Hen, > > Send from my mobile device > > > Am 17.10.2013 um 08:24 schrieb Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com>: > > > > Wooo! I won on my first post, and by being on the fence. Be afraid when I > > have a strong opinion, be wery, wery afraid :) Not allowed to drink > though. > > > > Hacking along tonight, I'm reminded of one reason why I would like to try > > Git in Commons. It's the only place I tend to be working on parallel > issues > > at the same time and I would like to stash (if that's the right verb) a > > patch that's part ready but waiting on feedback online. I started to > deploy > > the site with reports based on the uncommitted code and had to abort and > > restart. > > With git you can stash changes AND work in local branches (or push local > branches with history to your remote). Stashing is btw supported by some > IDE without SCM at all (I think idea can do it). Nevertheless I agree with > you, that this is a big + for git. > > I'd say we push out lang 3.2 and use lang as a test project, if all of > lang's developers can agree on this. > > <dev-h...@commons.apache.org> > I'm up for that. I'll play the role of a clueless newbie, just for the sake of testing you understand. :) Hen
