On 16 Oct 2013, at 22:46, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 10/16/13 1:34 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On 14 Oct 2013, at 9:13, Mark Thomas wrote:
Further, if the consensus amongst the active developers on a
component
is that they wish to stick to svn, I see no why that component
should be
forced to switch to git.
I had the idea too and support it.
Great. Then the three of us at least all agree. What I was
protesting was the conclusion that we had consensus to move all
components.
Not sure if i was perfectly clear:
I voted to move all components sooner or later to git. Not all at once.
But to start with one, try things out, learn and finally moving on with
the others one by one.
BUT if some maintainers of a component really have a problem with git,
I am of course accepting they are using svn while others can use git.
My impression is that most people who are working as team on a single
component
have a similar vision on the scm.
Usually I would now open a vote to see if we all agree.
Phil
Cheers
Christian
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---
http://www.grobmeier.de
@grobmeier
GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---
http://www.grobmeier.de
@grobmeier
GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
