On 8 October 2013 19:44, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8 Oct 2013, at 20:07, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>> Hey Gary,
>>
>> you are involved in other projects (like log4j2) how do they do it? Is it
>> easier to release log4j2 than it is to release for example [lang]?
>
>
> Check this guide:
> http://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4j2ReleaseGuide
>
> In fact we have an ASF maven pom:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/tags/apache-13/pom.xml
> This is extended by tons of plugins and other things and called "commons
> parent pom". The commons parent pom does a lot of things, and all components
> are more or less required to run the same way.
>
> The question is, why should a component not be independent from
> commons-parent-pom and decide on it's on? With having the ASF-parent only
> releasing could be:
>
> mvn release:prepare release:perform

Or equally using the package / deploy manual version.

> Then everything should be on Nexus.
>
> I know this is a controverse question. But as people can download the
> artifacts directly from nexus if they wish - including source, LICENSE,
> NOTICE and all that… why are we bothering to put on any other place?

If you are referring to staging for the release vote, then I agree,
it's not necessary to use another area.

But for formal ASF releases, these must be done via www.apache.org/dist/commons

> One could see at as: we release source code, as we create a tag. For
> convenience we put it on Nexus. Nothing else.

No - Nexus is the only way to release components to Maven Central;
it's not possible to publish jars to MC independently.
(With good reason - there were several accidental 'releases' before
Nexus was introduced).

> For site: I think components should be free to chose on their own. I was
> thinking different in the past. But now I believe we should just have a
> front page listing our components like we have here:
> http://logging.apache.org
> …and that site should link to the appropriate sub component site. How it
> looks or works or how it is build should be decided by the component
> maintainers independently.

OK by me, so long as the ASF branding etc. requirements are met.

> Cheers
> Christian
>
>
>> Benedikt
>>
>> Send from my mobile device
>>
>>> Am 08.10.2013 um 19:52 schrieb Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> IMO the problems are dealing with Nexus, a web site, and a 'dist'
>>> directory; that THREE things to get just right, none are 100% automated.
>>> With Nexus you have to do some manual steps. If you look at all the
>>> instructions for any commons component, it is long, a combo of manual and
>>> Maven+Nexus magic and error prone. It is not fun and a barrier.
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> one of the points that seem to always come up once in a while is the
>>>> process of releasing components. I've never done it myself so I'm asking
>>>> people who have done it:
>>>>
>>>> What are the problems and how can we make releasing easier?
>>>> Is the complexity of the parent pom a problem? (Do we really need all
>>>> the
>>>> stuff that is declared there?)
>>>> Is there a way to automate all the stuff that needs to be done in a
>>>> portable way?
>>>> Would it be possible to automate release for example on a Jenkins
>>>> instance?
>>>>
>>>> Benedikt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~britter/
>>>> http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
>>>> http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
>>>> http://github.com/britter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second
>>> Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>
>
> ---
> http://www.grobmeier.de
> @grobmeier
> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to