2013/8/6 Gary Gregory <[email protected]>

> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:19 AM, James Carman <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > I was trying to emphasize "all".
> >
>
> Then, yes, except Lexer which is currently subclassed by alternate test
> implementations.
>
> Do we still need those subclasses?
>

IMHO they don't make much sense, since they use the current trunk Lexer as
base. If we really want to compare the performance of the current trunk to
older revisions, we can simply checkout a complete revision instead of only
testing only part of the code.



>
> Gary
>
>
> >
> > On Tuesday, August 6, 2013, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:43 AM, James Carman <
> [email protected]
> > <javascript:;>
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am also -0 to this idea in general.  Are we talking about literally
> > > > making all classes final?
> > > >
> > >
> > > What is the difference between a class that is literally final and
> > > figuratively final? ;)
> > >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, August 6, 2013, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I think the idea is that it promotes composition instead of
> > > > > subclassing as the extension pattern.
> > > > >
> > > > > If I wanted the parser to produce a different kind of record,
> > > > >
> > > > > Gary
> > > > >
> > > > > On Aug 6, 2013, at 4:44, Emmanuel Bourg <[email protected]
> > <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Le 05/08/2013 19:34, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Thoughts?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -0, that's not very friendly to people willing to extend [csv].
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Emmanuel Bourg
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > <javascript:;>
> > > > <javascript:;>
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > <javascript:;>
> > > > <javascript:;>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > <javascript:;>
> > > > <javascript:;>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > E-Mail: [email protected] <javascript:;> | [email protected]
> > <javascript:;>
> > > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<
> > > http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> > > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> > > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> > > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> > > Home: http://garygregory.com/
> > > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<
> http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>



-- 
http://people.apache.org/~britter/
http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
http://github.com/britter

Reply via email to