On 03/26/2013 11:03 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 3/25/13 8:52 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Le 23/03/2013 16:30, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : >>> On 03/04/2013 01:57 PM, Gilles wrote: >>>> Hello. >>>> >>>>> I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. >>>>> Any thoughts about it? >>>> How soon? >>>> There are many unresolved issues targetting 3.2. >>>> There is at least one bug with no fix target (MATH-936). >>> >>>> There is at least one contribution requiring some feedback (MATH-917). >>> I have added a first patch and would love to get some feedback. >> It seems we are really close to releasing now. I guess MATH-817 will be >> resolved soon. What seems to be achievable in a short time frame would be: >> >> - wrapping up MATH-917 as Thomas proposed, >> - finishing MATH-437 (Kolmogorov-Smirnov), and perhaps also >> MATH-228 at the same time > See comment just added to MATH-437. I am working on it, but not > ready to commit to API, so say bump this to 3.3/4.0. > > One thing I did not mention in the MATH-437 comment. While I think > we should not do it in the K-S case, because the dist itself has > little value and much numeric instability, the approximation tricks > in your patch are interesting and might merit inclusion in > AbstractRealDistribution (which actually is where the impls belong).
Hi Phil, can you maybe also take a look at MATH-981? I have already provided a patch, but would like to hear your opinion on this as it is more a work-around for the moment. Thanks, Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
