Let me see if I understand. Are you saying, Ralph, that when we have generated content to expose on the website, we should commit it directly to the production website svn and mark it in extpaths.txt back in our tree in mainrepo, basically because that avoids the duplication that is created by storing the generated content directly in mainrepo when it would only be copied out anyway? Do I finally grasp the intent of expaths.txt?
Matt On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>wrote: > > On Dec 18, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > > > 2012/12/18 Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>: > >> I still don't understand why you are committing the subprojects to svn. > That is not required. Just use stage-deploy to deploy to a local > directory on your computer, then copy that under where you have the > production web site checked out and check it in. See > http://wiki.apache.org/logging/ManagingTheWebSite > >> > > As I can see in section "Managing Sub-project Sites" this doc says > > "Make sure all that is added to svn and commit it." > > So subsites must be checked in (here I configure this to be done tru a > > maven plugin and not manually) > > Infra will be able to use as production web site: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/cms-site/trunk/ (or > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/production/commons/content/ > > but this one still doesn't exist, I will ping infra on the jira entry > > for their preference). > > Step 6 is referring to checking it in directly to > https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/production/logging/content/in the > subdirectory that is listed in extpaths.txt, not some other > subversion location. If you look under log4j, for example, you will see a > directory for each release and a directory that is a symlink to the current > release (for Log4j 2 the 2.x directory links to log4j-2.0-beta3. > > > > > So if you want sub-project sites available AFAIK this (check in all > > content) must be done (or I misunderstand something: -)). > > > > Makes sense ? > > Not really. > > Ralph > > >
