I still don't understand why you are committing the subprojects to svn.  That 
is not required.  Just use stage-deploy to deploy to a local directory on your 
computer, then copy that under where you have the production web site checked 
out and check it in.  See http://wiki.apache.org/logging/ManagingTheWebSite


Ralph

On Dec 18, 2012, at 3:20 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:

> 2012/12/18 Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>:
>> 2012/12/18 Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com>:
>>> On 12/17/12 5:55 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>>> ETA of the migration:
>>>> collections and lang done.
>>>> 
>>>> results:
>>>> * http://people.apache.org/~olamy/commons/lang/
>>>> * http://people.apache.org/~olamy/commons/collections/
>>>> 
>>>> As Gary suggested old javadocs are
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~olamy/commons/lang/javadocs
>>>> 
>>>> NOTE I didn't import all previous versions. Does it make sense ?
>>> 
>>> Makes sense to me.  Older javadocs can be retrieved from the archives.
>>> 
>>> THANKS for jumping on this, Olivier!
>>> 
>>> Other than helping getting site builds working where they may be
>>> broken, what can the rest of us do to help?
>> Help me a bit on other components :-).
>> There are a lot to do (end of proper then sandbox then dormant.
>> What I can do is to import content manually for sandbox and dormant if
>> folks want to redeploy website due to code/documentation change they
>> will need to fix the pom (at least that will work for the migration)
>> Changes are easy to apply.
>> 
>> What about releasing the parent ? (I don't know what is the procedure
>> for that here).
>> 
>> Something else is the size of sites due to a lot of reporting
>> (cobertura, findbug, pmd, etc..) and that make svn commit very long.
>> What about using sonar ? We have an instance for asf projects
>> (https://analysis.apache.org). I can at least setup this for proper
>> projects.
>> 
>> WDYT ?
> 
> I have added 4 for testing (collections, cli, lang and ognl).
> See result: 
> https://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/org.apache.commons:commons-proper-aggregator
> 
> I missed to explain how to configure svnpubsub for site publication.
> 
> Use last parent pom 28-SNAPSHOT
> 
> add a property to define site path:
> <commons.site.path>ognl</commons.site.path>
> (http://commons.apache.org/ognl)
> That will commit site content to
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/cms-site/trunk/ognl/
> 
> Then test it :-)
> mvn clean site site:stage scm-publish:publish-scm
> To pass your svn authz:
> -Dusername=asf id
> -Dpassword=asf password
> 
> Once is done add the new path to
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/commons-site/trunk/content/resources/extpaths.txt
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Phil
>>>> 
>>>> digester I have issues while building trunk
>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
>>>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.0:testCompile
>>>> (default-testCompile) on project commons-digester3-ap: Compilation
>>>> failure: Compilation failure:
>>>> [ERROR] error: Impossible to generate class
>>>> org.apache.commons.digester3.annotations.processor.GeneratedRulesModule:
>>>> Attempt to recreate a file for type
>>>> org.apache.commons.digester3.annotations.processor.GeneratedRulesModule
>>>> [ERROR] error: Impossible to generate class
>>>> org.apache.commons.digester3.annotations.processor.GeneratedRulesModule:
>>>> Attempt to recreate a file for type
>>>> org.apache.commons.digester3.annotations.processor.GeneratedRulesModule
>>>> [ERROR] -> [Help 1]
>>>> [ERROR]
>>>> [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with
>>>> the -e switch.
>>>> [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
>>>> 
>>>> So I stop for it as no idea on WTF here
>>>> 
>>>> 2012/12/15 Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>:
>>>>> 2012/12/15 Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>:
>>>>>> 2012/12/15 Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>:
>>>>>>> And now I'm even more confused since I just saw your commits to build 
>>>>>>> the CMS site using Maven.
>>>>>> I started with main site and as I'm in eu I wanted to sleep a bit :-).
>>>>>> I will try to work on sub projects today (it's only a matter of
>>>>>> configuring parent pom normally)
>>>>>> And test with deploying to
>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/cms-site/trunk/.
>>>>> I will start with digester and collections.
>>>>> As I can see there is a lot of content deployed manually. I think
>>>>> about versionned documentation
>>>>> (http://commons.apache.org/digester/commons-digester-3.1) so this will
>>>>> need to be imported manually to
>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/cms-site/trunk/
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Ralph
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Dec 14, 2012, at 6:35 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> So now I'm confused.  You are proposing to bypass the CMS altogether 
>>>>>>>> and only publish to the live site.  Why?  Even projects like Flume 
>>>>>>>> that use maven for the site build still do it in the CMS.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Ralph
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Dec 14, 2012, at 4:33 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 2012/12/15 Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>:
>>>>>>>>>> 2012/12/15 Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier,
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your response and offer to contribute!  We do have a few
>>>>>>>>>>> multi-module components here.  Of "proper" components, there is 
>>>>>>>>>>> only [jci]
>>>>>>>>>>> that I know of, but [proxy]'s 2.0 branch is multimodule, and we had
>>>>>>>>>>> intended to take [functor] multimodule before a release is made.  
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>>>>>> perusing your wiki link now.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you can update the jira entry to say you want a solution "à 
>>>>>>>>>> la" maven ?
>>>>>>>>>> and website content from
>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/production/commons/content/
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I will update commons-site now to get it working for cms.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Done.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> For deploying I can try make configuration easy if you accept to use
>>>>>>>>>> something like: mvn site site:stage scm-publish:publish-scm rather
>>>>>>>>>> than mvn site-deploy (btw that won't be possible for multi modules 
>>>>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>>>>> ).
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Note that will need a release of your parent pom.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> /me listening here
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Note maven.apache.org has been migrated this week.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want to mix cms and maven site generation, we do that.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: even the main site is generated with a maven build but we can
>>>>>>>>>>>> edit files (apt/xdoc/markdown) with the cms editor
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> The source tree need some modifications: see
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/site/trunk/ and a bit of
>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation here: http://apache.org/dev/cmsadoption#maven .
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know if you need some help (I think I have karma here so I 
>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>> do a bit of pom.xml stuff :-) )
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe instead of 
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/cms-site/trunk/
>>>>>>>>>>>> you could use 
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/production/
>>>>>>>>>>>> which is dedicated to this purpose.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> As I can see you are using this module
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/commons-site/trunk/
>>>>>>>>>>>> for main site ?
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want I can do the necessary changes to make it working with
>>>>>>>>>>>> both cms and mvn site.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> For sub projects, that's easy if all are mono modules projects (in
>>>>>>>>>>>> this case mvn site-deploy works)
>>>>>>>>>>>> For multi modules, it's a bit different. Is there any multi modules
>>>>>>>>>>>> projects here ?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2012/12/14 Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I never questioned that the individual components would most 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> likely
>>>>>>>>>>>>> continue with the Maven-generated content.  I do question whether 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> we want
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to bother laying out the main site when we have something that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> br,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Gilles Sadowski <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 03:52:17PM -0600, Matt Benson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've just added the directory to our svn tree so that there 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> someplace at which to point it.  I think the next step is to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> determine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether we want a "normal" CMS site like Logging has, in which 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> case we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could prop something up with e.g. Twitter bootstrap as is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> becoming
>>>>>>>>>>>> quite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> popular among ASF TLPs.  If we like to keep a Maven-generated 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look,
>>>>>>>>>>>> we'd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably be best advised to consult the Maven folks on how 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they're
>>>>>>>>>>>> doing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I interpret correctly what I see, the "logging" site has 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both: The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> top-level site is "powered by Twitter Bootstrap" while the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "components"
>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "built by maven".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That looks like a nice starting point. I.e. we should have the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> top-level
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> web
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CMS-site set up to replace the "Commons" homepage, and every 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "sub-sites"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> button would point to the corresponding legacy site (until the
>>>>>>>>>>>> components'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sites themselves are ready).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gilles
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Gilles Sadowski <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 03:12:31PM -0600, Matt Benson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been talking to Joe S. on #asfinfra about this; rather 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test site infra would prefer we request the CMS site, just not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exposed to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commons.a.o until we're satisfied with it.  Do we want to use 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CMS a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> la
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Logging, or do we want to explore keeping the main site
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maven-generated?  The Maven guys, particularly Olivier Lamy 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (do
>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> follow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Commons MLs?) may be able to help us if we want to go that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> way.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maven still seems to be using the CMS at some level [1], so I
>>>>>>>>>>>> guess
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just request the CMS site and go from there.  Issue created.  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is the new (empty, I guess) cms-web site accessible?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gilles
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://maventest.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5657
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Ralph Goers <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At the very least, someone should file a Jira asking for a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commons-test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> site.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ralph
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 10, 2012, at 10:14 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/10/12 5:10 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 10, 2012, at 4:12 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10 December 2012 21:53, Phil Steitz <
>>>>>>>>>>>> phil.ste...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/10/12 1:27 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I think you are missing something fundamental.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you check in "the whole mess" you will never again be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> able to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> properly build a sub-project's site with Maven.  This is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process of updating the site would require first doing a diff
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deleting items that are not included in the new version. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Someone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> created a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maven plugin to try to do this but it is not the way I would
>>>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> go at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, I don't get it.  Why won't the following work:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0) Grab all of, say p.a.o/www/commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) check all of that into an svn repo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) when I want to update, say, math, I generate the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> locally,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> copy it to the /math subtree and check it in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There would need to be some extra work done to ensure that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stale
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are deleted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I get it now.  In practice, with maven sites, is this a big
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deal?  I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't remember seeing lots of cruft accumulating on p.a.o,
>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would happen if this were common.  If it is not that common,
>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manual svn rm's would not be that onerous.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Phil
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some projects, it would be possible to just delete the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> existing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sub-tree and check the whole new site in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [This can be done as one transaction in svnmucc]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, for sites that retain Javadoc etc. for older
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases, one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would need to re-instate that part of the tree somehow.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Given that svnpubsub immediately publishes what is checked
>>>>>>>>>>>> in,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> might be sensible to have a parallel staging directory 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tree
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files can be updated piecemeal if necessary, and then use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> svnmucc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> replace the live component subtree with the staging
>>>>>>>>>>>> component
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subtree
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as part of a single transaction.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There would need to be some co-ordination between 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updating commons parent, as that would affect the whole
>>>>>>>>>>>> tree.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. This is why Logging used the extpath approach where 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subproject commits directly to production. Each release goes 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subdirectory under each subproject's directory.  Then you can
>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perform
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your maven site build to a local directory, copy that into 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> production
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> svn location, and commit it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See "Managing the subproject sites" at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/logging/ManagingTheWebSite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ralph
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier Lamy
>>>>>>>>>>>> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Olivier Lamy
>>>>>>>>>> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Olivier Lamy
>>>>>>>>> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Olivier Lamy
>>>>> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
>>>>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Olivier Lamy
>> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 

Reply via email to