Jörg Schaible wrote: > Gary Gregory wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@gmx.de> >> wrote: >> >>> Jörg Schaible wrote: >>> >>> > >>> > sebb wrote: >>> >>> [snip] >>> >>> >> I find the naming convention rather difficult to follow. >>> >> >>> >> For example, the letter 's' sometimes means 'array' and sometimes >>> >> means 'string' Also M0 is not obvious as an abbreviation, nor is BeM0 >>> > >>> > I am all open for better names, all *I* want to have is the >>> functionality. >>> >>> Has anyone a better idea for the names? >>> >> >> I would probably loose the plural to indicate an array. > > This is also ambiguous. Probably it would be better to use "array" > directly. e.g.: > > - byteArrayToLong > - longToByteArray
Done. Used "binary" for "boolArray" though, because that's what it meant. >> I would expand M0 to Msb0 which itself is an acronym. Abbreviating an >> acronym is to mysterious to me. Done. [snip] >> I would use real examples in the Javadoc: >> >> * <p> >> * (true, false, false, false) is converted as follow: '8' ... >> >> instead of: >> >> * <p> >> * (1, 0, 0, 0) is converted as follow: '8' ... >> >> and use [ ] instead of ( ) to show an array The example is for binary representation (which is modeled with boolean arrays), therefore I kept the representation here. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
