On 2012-08-20 19:25, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 20/08/2012 17:00, Clemens Novak a écrit :
Dear all,

Hi Clemens,


I would like to work on some signal processing functions (as indicated on the wiki WishList) and started with the convolution of 2 sequences (represented as RealVector). I have completed a first working version (some error checking code, formatting, unit tests etc are missing); I am unsure of how to continue: Is the next step to create a new Jira ticket
and upload my final code there (for further discussion/review/...)?

Yes, you can do that.


Thanks for your help & kind regards - Clemens

Thanks for your interest and contribution.

Luc



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Dear all,

besides the ongoing discussions in MATH-851, I would like to discuss some extensions of this library in the area of discrete-time signal processing:

(1) convolution of 1D and 2D sequences based on (i) straightforward calculation of the convolution sum and (ii) using the FFT.

(2) filter functions for 1D sequences, i.e. y[n] = \sum_{l=0}^{L-1} b_l x[n-l] - \sum_{m=1}^{M-1} a_m y[n-m]

(3) window functions (such as raised cosine, blackmann...) used in conjunction with FFTs

(4) possibly some basic filter design (such as window method, Parks-McClellan algorithm...)

However, first I want to ensure that you think these topics belong in Commons math - I have been reading the intro (... is a library of lightweight, self-contained mathematics and statistics components addressing the most common problems...) and I am not perfectly sure whether these topics really fit here?

In MATH-851 we shortly touched whether using RealVector or a simple double array is better. What's your opinion here? The double array might be better in terms of performance; when based on RealVector, however, more basic functionality would be provided out of the box. Has anyone made a performance comparison between arrays and RealVector in order to have some guidelines here?

Kind regards - Clemens

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to