On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Le 09/03/2012 12:29, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > This is pretty subjective stuff. Personally I like the stock Java 7 >> best of all (java 6, java 7 "fix"). >> > > To be clear, you find this : > > http://s3.amazonaws.com/uso_**ss/13457/large.png<http://s3.amazonaws.com/uso_ss/13457/large.png> > (left aligned return type, non indented method description, wide gap > between the return type column and the description column, bold characters > for methods and objects) > > more readable than this?: > > http://s3.amazonaws.com/uso_**ss/13458/large.png<http://s3.amazonaws.com/uso_ss/13458/large.png> > To me, yes, the former is better than the later. Different strokes for different folks. For me the extra indentation is noisy and ugly. > > I would be interested to understand what makes you prefer the stock Java 7 > style, I could improve the fix. For example the added cell borders are > probably debatable. > It's all debatable IMO :) For my taste, I do not like that the "Modifier and Type" column stretches so far from the "Method and Description" column, it makes them feel detached on a wide screen. But I'm not going to fiddle with CSS to "fix" it because it's not broken, it's just a personal preference... Gary > > > Emmanuel Bourg > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0 Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
