2012/2/9 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: > On 9 February 2012 16:01, Thomas Neidhart <thomas.neidh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 02/09/2012 03:46 PM, sebb wrote: >> >>> Both Id and Revision are fine, and can both be useful. >>> >>> There's no harm in having the keywords set - it's only a problem if >>> they are *used*. >>> But having them set might encourage their use. >> >> Ok, makes sense to not set the other keywords just in case. Btw. >> >> Actually, I have taken the default settings from here: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingSVN > > Did not know about that; fixed. >
Note that there exists official http://www.apache.org/dev/svn-eol-style.txt >> Maybe we should add a section in the developers guide for the math >> component: >> >> http://commons.apache.org/math/developers.html > > Or update the Commons guidelines (if any)? > >> A short statistic on the source files in src/main/java: >> >> 61 "Author Date Id Revision" > > That's a bug - the quotes will be treated as part of the keyword, so > (e.g.) Revision won't work. > >> 429 Author Date Id Revision >> 2 Date Revision >> 7 Date Revision Id >> >> 121 file do not have keywords set yet. >From practical point of view (I cannot say anything about policies) the svn:keywords property is needed only if those keywords are actually used in those files. The "Author Date Id Revision" value (without quotes) should have brought in by CVS->SVN migration. Best regards, Konstantin Kolinko --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
