2011/12/21 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: > On 21 December 2011 12:14, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Dec 21, 2011, at 7:12, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I slightly prefer Imaging to Image as well. >>> >>> Could also call it JIL - Java Imaging Library - by analogy with JCS and JCI. >>> >>> Commons Image >>> Commons Imaging >>> Commons JIL >>> >>> But I'm not sure that's any better than Imaging. >> >> Let's not forget the obvious: imageio. > > Just about to suggest that myself. > >> That fits in the Java 5 and commons naming nicely. Java 5 provides >> javax.imageio, which we should take advantage of if possible. >>
Oracle's imageio has notable bug that we had to mention in Tomcat FAQ http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/KnownIssues If "imageio" is a package name that is OK, but if it is a component name I think it might cause confusion. >From proposals thus far I like "Commons Imaging" the most. (Not binding). Best regards, Konstantin Kolinko --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
