On 12/11/11 6:28 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 10, 2011, at 6:31 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11 December 2011 00:29, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> This is a patch release, including a couple of bug fixes.
>>>>
>>>> The release artifacts are here:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.7-rc3/
>>>>
>>>> Release notes:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.7-rc3/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>>>>
>>>> Maven distribution:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.7-rc3/maven
>>> There's no test jar - I thought we were going to try providing those?
>>> I think that is one of the added features in the CP 22 release profile.
>> This is a patch release identical to 1.5.6  other than the two bug fixes
>> in the release notes.  I see no reason to add artifacts.
>>
>>>> Site:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.7-rc3/docs
>>>> (Links, including an added link to the released API docs, will be
>>>> updated post release)
>>> It would be nice to have a Clirr report for the differences from 1.5.6
>>> as well as from 1.5.
>>> Dunno if that is possible
>> There were no API changes.
>>
>>>> Tag:
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_7_RC3
>>> Uses old Commons Parent version.
>> That is intentional.  Avoids some issues generating artifacts.  Again,
>> this is just a patch release on a maintenance branch. No reason to mess
>> with a working build.
>>
> "working", yes on Maven 2, but not on Maven 3:
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.0-beta-3:site (default-site)
> on project commons
> to parse configuration of mojo
> org.codehaus.mojo:findbugs-maven-plugin:1.2:findbugs for parameter
> localRepository: Abstract
> .artifact.repository.DefaultArtifactRepository' cannot be instantiated ->
> [Help 1]
>
> Apache Maven 3.0.3 (r1075438; 2011-02-28 12:31:09-0500)
> Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.3\bin\..
> Java version: 1.6.0_29, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_29\jre
> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
> OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
> C:\temp\commons-pool-1.5.7-src>set java_home=%java_7_home%
>
> It's nice to touch as little as possible in production code for a
> maintenance release, but the build should be OK to move forward IMO.
> Especially when you cannot even build on M3. I also like the consistency of
> a current releases using the current parent POM.

No.  Maven and maven plugins make incompatible changes regularly. 
We can't possibly expect our releases to work with future
incompatible changes in maven or maven plugins.

I see no reason to reengineer the build between 1.5.6 and 1.5.7 on a
maintenance branch.  Is there anything wrong with the release
artifacts or code? 

Phil
>
> +0
>
> Gary
>
>
>
>>> Many source files use $Date:$ SVN markers; these make it awkward to
>>> compare against the SVN tag
>>>
>>>> Votes, please.  This vote will close in 72 hours, 14-DEC-01:00 GMT.
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 I support this release
>>>> [X] +0 OK, but...
>>>> [ ] -0 Not happy about this because...
>>>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Phil
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to