Le 29/10/2011 12:55, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 09:10:12AM +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Le 28/10/2011 23:30, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : >>> Hello. >>> >>> I think that something is not quite right in those class names: >>> UnivariateMatrixFunction >>> UnivariateRealFunction >>> UnivariateVectorialFunction >>> >>> To be consistent, we should either >>> 1. indicate the "grouping" and "number" type everywhere: >>> UnivariateRealMatrixFunction >>> UnivariateRealFunction >>> UnivariateRealVectorialFunction >>> 2. assume that the "number" type is "Real", and drop it everywhere: >>> UnivariateMatrixFunction >>> UnivariateFunction >>> UnivariateVectorialFunction >>> 3. assume that the "number" type is "Real", drop it everywhere, and >>> indicate the "grouping" explicitly everywhere: >>> UnivariateMatrixFunction >>> UnivariateScalarFunction >>> UnivariateVectorialFunction >>> >>> The same goes for "Multivariate...", "Differentiable...", and the optimizers >>> naming. >>> >>> I'd say that option 2 is the least disruptive, and most practical as >>> UnivariateFunction >>> is more common (and shorter) than >>> UnivariateScalarFunction >> >> You're right, lets go to a more consistent scheme. Option 2 is fair. > > What do you think of Ted's suggestion: > Vectorial -> Vector > ?
As he is a native English speaker, he is surely right. Luc > > > Gilles > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
