Shouldn't Vectorial be Vector? On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Gilles Sadowski < gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> Hello. > > I think that something is not quite right in those class names: > UnivariateMatrixFunction > UnivariateRealFunction > UnivariateVectorialFunction > > To be consistent, we should either > 1. indicate the "grouping" and "number" type everywhere: > UnivariateRealMatrixFunction > UnivariateRealFunction > UnivariateRealVectorialFunction > 2. assume that the "number" type is "Real", and drop it everywhere: > UnivariateMatrixFunction > UnivariateFunction > UnivariateVectorialFunction > 3. assume that the "number" type is "Real", drop it everywhere, and > indicate the "grouping" explicitly everywhere: > UnivariateMatrixFunction > UnivariateScalarFunction > UnivariateVectorialFunction > > The same goes for "Multivariate...", "Differentiable...", and the > optimizers > naming. > > I'd say that option 2 is the least disruptive, and most practical as > UnivariateFunction > is more common (and shorter) than > UnivariateScalarFunction > > > > Regards, > Gilles > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
