On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote:

> +0
>
> The test coverage of Pack200CompressorInputStream is a bit low, the read
> methods do not seem to be tested.
>
> Also in the matches() method the constant '4' could be replaced by
> CAFE_DOOD.length
>
> Emmanuel Bourg


In the same vein, in trunk now, the following have 0% code coverage
according to Cobertura:

- Lister

- DumpArchiveConstants: How can it have 0% when it is used? Does Cobertura
know how to deal with enums?
- DumpArchiveException
- InvalidFormatException
- ShortFileException
- UnrecognizedFormatException
- UnsupportedCompressionAlgorithmException

- TarArchiveSparseEntry

- Zip64RequiredException
- ZipConstants: Same oddity as above?
- ZipFile$BoundedInputStream

- CompressorException

- Rand

The trunk POM uses cobertura-maven-plugin 2.2 (= Cobertura 1.9) and not the
latest 2.5.1 (= Cobertura 1.9.4.1).

With the latest plugin, the number are a little worse overall and for some
classes a little better. The report is more detailed with other classes,
with some annon inner classes (...$1) added for example.

I've updated the POM in SVN trunk. FYI, reqs are Maven 2.0.8 and Java 5, so
we are good.

Gary



>
>
>
> Le 26/10/2011 06:54, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
>
>> Compress 1.3 RC1 is available for review here:
>>
>>     
>> http://people.apache.org/~**bodewig/commons-compress/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ebodewig/commons-compress/>
>>
>>   Maven artifacts are here:
>>     https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
>> orgapachecommons-101/org/**apache/commons/commons-**compress/1.3/<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-101/org/apache/commons/commons-compress/1.3/>
>>
>>   Details of changes since 1.1 are in the release notes:
>>     http://people.apache.org/~**bodewig/commons-compress/**
>> RELEASE-NOTES.txt<http://people.apache.org/%7Ebodewig/commons-compress/RELEASE-NOTES.txt>
>>     http://people.apache.org/~**bodewig/commons-compress/site/**
>> changes-report.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Ebodewig/commons-compress/site/changes-report.html>
>>
>>   I have tested this with Sun JDK 1.5 and OpenJDK 1.6 using maven2.
>>
>>   The tag is here (revision 1189016):
>>     http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**commons/proper/compress/tags/**
>> COMPRESS_1.3_RC1/<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/compress/tags/COMPRESS_1.3_RC1/>
>>
>>   Site:
>>     
>> http://people.apache.org/~**bodewig/commons-compress/site/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ebodewig/commons-compress/site/>
>>
>>   Clirr Report (compared to 1.2):
>>     http://people.apache.org/~**bodewig/commons-compress/site/**
>> clirr-report.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Ebodewig/commons-compress/site/clirr-report.html>
>>
>>   RAT Report:
>>     http://people.apache.org/~**bodewig/commons-compress/site/**
>> rat-report.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Ebodewig/commons-compress/site/rat-report.html>
>>
>>   Votes, please.  This vote will close in 72 hours, 0500 GMT 29-October
>> 2011
>>
>>   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>>   [ ] +0 OK, but...
>>   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>>   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
>> dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0
Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to