When you say trunk would be replaced by the tag name would that be the tag that
ends with RCx? If so I'd have a problem with that as that tag won't exist for
long.
Ralph
On Sep 10, 2011, at 6:00 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 10 September 2011 21:04, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 10, 2011, at 10:34 AM, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't see what the harm is in adding the header line.
>>
>> Before I agree with you I'd want to see what the exact definition would be.
>
> The manifest config in the pom is:
>
> <Implementation-Build>${implementation.build}</Implementation-Build>
> where
> <maven.build.timestamp.format>yyyy-MM-dd
> HH:mm:ssZ</maven.build.timestamp.format>
> <implementation.build>${scmBranch}@r${buildNumber};
> ${maven.build.timestamp}</implementation.build>
>
> for example in the actual manifest.
>
> Implementation-Build: trunk@r1163241; 2011-09-11 01:55:42+0100
>
> obviously trunk would be replaced by the tag name.
>
> The format and manifest header name could of course be easily changed,
> or the details could potentially be stored elsewhere in the jar.
>
>> Ralph
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
