When you say trunk would be replaced by the tag name would that be the tag that ends with RCx? If so I'd have a problem with that as that tag won't exist for long.
Ralph On Sep 10, 2011, at 6:00 PM, sebb wrote: > On 10 September 2011 21:04, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: >> >> On Sep 10, 2011, at 10:34 AM, sebb wrote: >>> >>> >>> I don't see what the harm is in adding the header line. >> >> Before I agree with you I'd want to see what the exact definition would be. > > The manifest config in the pom is: > > <Implementation-Build>${implementation.build}</Implementation-Build> > where > <maven.build.timestamp.format>yyyy-MM-dd > HH:mm:ssZ</maven.build.timestamp.format> > <implementation.build>${scmBranch}@r${buildNumber}; > ${maven.build.timestamp}</implementation.build> > > for example in the actual manifest. > > Implementation-Build: trunk@r1163241; 2011-09-11 01:55:42+0100 > > obviously trunk would be replaced by the tag name. > > The format and manifest header name could of course be easily changed, > or the details could potentially be stored elsewhere in the jar. > >> Ralph >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org