On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 01:03:22PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 9/9/11 12:13 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I was wondering if anyone of you had the chance to look at the new
> > piece of code submitted (JIRA MATH-655).
> > Thanks for your comments!
> 
> Sorry to be slow on this.  I would say go ahead and commit the last
> patch and we can talk about patching from there.  I don't have any
> significant comments.  Only
> 
> 0) maybe incrementIterationCount in the manager should be called
> startIteration
> 1) I guess TooManyEvaluations is the only thing left to throw, but
> MaxIterationsExceeded or even something new like IllegalIteration
> might make sense here (bad name, but once we introduce
> StoppingCriteria, something like that will make sense).
> 2) It is tempting to go ahead and define the StoppingCondition and
> add it as a constructor parameter for the manager.
> 3) Incrementor is a little crippled not exposing a constructor with
> the max  - could be we should add that and use it in the manager.

Somewhat less crippled in revision 1167371.

> 4) Similarly Incrementor could expose a hasMore() or somesuch,

Also done ("canIncrement").

> which
> would provide a meaningful default for shouldStop and also provide
> the basis for an iterationsExhausted event.
> 5) It may be extra noise and I know we need to be careful with this,
> but a fireIterationStarted source might be useful in some contexts.


Gilles

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to