In fact, getArrayRef does not belong to the RealVector class. It is only defined in ArrayRealVector (which is backed by a double[]). Sébastien
2011/9/7 Arne Ploese <aplo...@gmx.de>: > If toArray() returns always a copy and if getArrayRef() throws an > exception if there is no backing array, it would be much clearer. A > property isArray() is needed in this case. > > Arne > > Am Mittwoch, den 07.09.2011, 04:19 +0200 schrieb Sébastien Brisard: >> Hi, >> as noted in MATH-653, these two methods are redundant, and one should >> go. Pros and cons are >> * toArray() is fairly classical in the Java world >> * but getData() is consistent with ArrayRealVector.getDataRef(). >> Personnaly, my preference goes to keeping toArray(). In order to >> maintain consistency, should ArrayRealVector.getDataRef() be renamed >> getArrayRef() ? >> >> Sébastien >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
