If toArray() returns always a copy and if getArrayRef() throws an exception if there is no backing array, it would be much clearer. A property isArray() is needed in this case.
Arne Am Mittwoch, den 07.09.2011, 04:19 +0200 schrieb Sébastien Brisard: > Hi, > as noted in MATH-653, these two methods are redundant, and one should > go. Pros and cons are > * toArray() is fairly classical in the Java world > * but getData() is consistent with ArrayRealVector.getDataRef(). > Personnaly, my preference goes to keeping toArray(). In order to > maintain consistency, should ArrayRealVector.getDataRef() be renamed > getArrayRef() ? > > Sébastien > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
