On 31/08/2011 20:28, Phil Steitz wrote: > Is 1.x vulnerable to this? I don't think so. I believe this was the result of my re-factoring. The good news was that I spotted it just by looking at the code with a fresh set of eyes. Things are a lot easier to follow in 2.x
Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
