If someone else wants to post the vote results while I'm in the air I'm fine 
with that too.

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:31 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:

> I'm traveling today and will post the vote results when I arrive at my 
> destination later tonight. 
> 
> The package name change was discussed last November at which time I was 
> instructed to change them. 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:10 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Without the package name change, would it be a drop in replacement?
>> Aside from changes for providers that is. I am wondering what this
>> would look like for clients only.
>> 
>> Gary
>> 
>> On Aug 21, 2011, at 8:33, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 18 August 2011 17:25, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>>> This is a vote to release Apache Commons VFS 2.0.
>>>> 
>>>> Changes made since the last candidate:
>>>> 
>>>> * Removed the sandbox project from the delivery, except for the web site.
>>>> * Updated README.txt to remove the existing text and add very basic build 
>>>> instructions.
>>>> 
>>>> I have also removed files that shouldn't be present in the Maven 
>>>> repository from the staging repo, except for the distribution files which 
>>>> will be moved to the standard distribution location and not deployed to 
>>>> the Nexus repository when the artifacts are released.
>>>> 
>>>> [ ] +1 release it
>>>> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
>>>> [ ] -1 no, do not release it because.
>>> 
>>> The release itself is fine.
>>> 
>>> However I still question whether it really needs to break binary 
>>> compatibility.
>>> As the news section on the front page says:
>>> 
>>> "The API changes are fairly minor and will mostly impact provider
>>> implementations."
>>> 
>>> This does not seem like it really requires binary compatibility to be
>>> broken, with all the resulting downstream work that is involved.
>>> 
>>> I am therefore abstaining on this vote.
>>> 
>>>> Ralph
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Tag: 
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/vfs/tags/commons-vfs2-project-2.0/
>>>>   (revision 1159220).
>>>> 
>>>> Site: http://people.apache.org/~rgoers/commons-vfs/site/
>>> 
>>> The News section paragraph contains several items of information and
>>> is not all that easy to read.
>>> 
>>> I think it would be good to make the compatibiltity statement stand out 
>>> more:
>>> - start new paragraphs for "Version 2.0 is not binary compatible ..."
>>> and "The API changes ..."
>>> - possibly embolden some phrases in the second para.
>>> 
>>> http://people.apache.org/~rgoers/commons-vfs/site/download.html
>>> 
>>> Contains a list of dependencies. Just wondering whether it should
>>> still contain the references to Sandbox?
>>> 
>>> [these can be fixed independently of the release]
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The artifacts have been staged to the org.apache.commons-052 (u:rgoers, 
>>>> a:99.180.69.21) repository.
>>>> 
>>>> The Maven artifacts are at:
>>>> 
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/commons/commons-vfs2/
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/commons/commons-vfs2-examples/
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/commons/commons-vfs2-project/
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/commons/commons-vfs2-distribution/
>>>> 
>>>> and consist of
>>>> 
>>>> archetype-catalog.xml
>>>> commons-vfs2-examples-2.0-javadoc.jar
>>>> commons-vfs2-examples-2.0-sources.jar.asc
>>>> commons-vfs2-examples-2.0.pom
>>>> commons-vfs2-examples-2.0-tests.jar
>>>> commons-vfs2-examples-2.0-tests.jar.asc
>>>> commons-vfs2-examples-2.0.jar.asc
>>>> commons-vfs2-examples-2.0.pom.asc
>>>> commons-vfs2-examples-2.0-javadoc.jar.asc
>>>> commons-vfs2-examples-2.0.jar
>>>> commons-vfs2-examples-2.0-sources.jar
>>>> commons-vfs2-project-2.0.pom.asc
>>>> commons-vfs2-project-2.0.pom
>>>> commons-vfs2-distribution-2.0-src.tar.gz
>>>> commons-vfs2-distribution-2.0-src.tar.gz.asc
>>>> commons-vfs2-distribution-2.0-src.zip.asc
>>>> commons-vfs2-distribution-2.0-bin.zip
>>>> commons-vfs2-distribution-2.0-bin.tar.gz
>>>> commons-vfs2-distribution-2.0-bin.tar.gz.asc
>>>> commons-vfs2-distribution-2.0-src.zip
>>>> commons-vfs2-distribution-2.0-bin.zip.asc
>>>> commons-vfs2-2.0.pom.asc
>>>> commons-vfs2-2.0-javadoc.jar
>>>> commons-vfs2-2.0-tests.jar.asc
>>>> commons-vfs2-2.0-tests.jar
>>>> commons-vfs2-2.0.pom
>>>> commons-vfs2-2.0.jar
>>>> commons-vfs2-2.0-sources.jar.asc
>>>> commons-vfs2-2.0-test-sources.jar.asc
>>>> commons-vfs2-2.0.jar.asc
>>>> commons-vfs2-2.0-sources.jar
>>>> commons-vfs2-2.0-test-sources.jar
>>>> commons-vfs2-2.0-javadoc.jar.asc
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to