Without the package name change, would it be a drop in replacement?
Aside from changes for providers that is. I am wondering what this
would look like for clients only.

Gary

On Aug 21, 2011, at 8:33, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 18 August 2011 17:25, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>> This is a vote to release Apache Commons VFS 2.0.
>>
>> Changes made since the last candidate:
>>
>> * Removed the sandbox project from the delivery, except for the web site.
>> * Updated README.txt to remove the existing text and add very basic build 
>> instructions.
>>
>> I have also removed files that shouldn't be present in the Maven repository 
>> from the staging repo, except for the distribution files which will be moved 
>> to the standard distribution location and not deployed to the Nexus 
>> repository when the artifacts are released.
>>
>> [ ] +1 release it
>> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
>> [ ] -1 no, do not release it because.
>
> The release itself is fine.
>
> However I still question whether it really needs to break binary 
> compatibility.
> As the news section on the front page says:
>
> "The API changes are fairly minor and will mostly impact provider
> implementations."
>
> This does not seem like it really requires binary compatibility to be
> broken, with all the resulting downstream work that is involved.
>
> I am therefore abstaining on this vote.
>
>> Ralph
>>
>>
>> Tag: 
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/vfs/tags/commons-vfs2-project-2.0/
>>   (revision 1159220).
>>
>> Site: http://people.apache.org/~rgoers/commons-vfs/site/
>
> The News section paragraph contains several items of information and
> is not all that easy to read.
>
> I think it would be good to make the compatibiltity statement stand out more:
> - start new paragraphs for "Version 2.0 is not binary compatible ..."
> and "The API changes ..."
> - possibly embolden some phrases in the second para.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rgoers/commons-vfs/site/download.html
>
> Contains a list of dependencies. Just wondering whether it should
> still contain the references to Sandbox?
>
> [these can be fixed independently of the release]
>
>>
>> The artifacts have been staged to the org.apache.commons-052 (u:rgoers, 
>> a:99.180.69.21) repository.
>>
>> The Maven artifacts are at:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/commons/commons-vfs2/
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/commons/commons-vfs2-examples/
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/commons/commons-vfs2-project/
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/commons/commons-vfs2-distribution/
>>
>> and consist of
>>
>> archetype-catalog.xml
>> commons-vfs2-examples-2.0-javadoc.jar
>> commons-vfs2-examples-2.0-sources.jar.asc
>> commons-vfs2-examples-2.0.pom
>> commons-vfs2-examples-2.0-tests.jar
>> commons-vfs2-examples-2.0-tests.jar.asc
>> commons-vfs2-examples-2.0.jar.asc
>> commons-vfs2-examples-2.0.pom.asc
>> commons-vfs2-examples-2.0-javadoc.jar.asc
>> commons-vfs2-examples-2.0.jar
>> commons-vfs2-examples-2.0-sources.jar
>> commons-vfs2-project-2.0.pom.asc
>> commons-vfs2-project-2.0.pom
>> commons-vfs2-distribution-2.0-src.tar.gz
>> commons-vfs2-distribution-2.0-src.tar.gz.asc
>> commons-vfs2-distribution-2.0-src.zip.asc
>> commons-vfs2-distribution-2.0-bin.zip
>> commons-vfs2-distribution-2.0-bin.tar.gz
>> commons-vfs2-distribution-2.0-bin.tar.gz.asc
>> commons-vfs2-distribution-2.0-src.zip
>> commons-vfs2-distribution-2.0-bin.zip.asc
>> commons-vfs2-2.0.pom.asc
>> commons-vfs2-2.0-javadoc.jar
>> commons-vfs2-2.0-tests.jar.asc
>> commons-vfs2-2.0-tests.jar
>> commons-vfs2-2.0.pom
>> commons-vfs2-2.0.jar
>> commons-vfs2-2.0-sources.jar.asc
>> commons-vfs2-2.0-test-sources.jar.asc
>> commons-vfs2-2.0.jar.asc
>> commons-vfs2-2.0-sources.jar
>> commons-vfs2-2.0-test-sources.jar
>> commons-vfs2-2.0-javadoc.jar.asc
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to