On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Raman Gupta <rocketra...@fastmail.fm> wrote: >> Perhaps I'm missing something, but what exactly is wrong with simply >> using slf4j? It is an extremely simple, widely used library that >> provides out of the box hooks for many logging frameworks including >> log4j and logback, simple to configure (i.e. drop the appropriate jars >> in and thats it), and works out of the box in an OSGi environment? The >> only downside appears to be that it is not an Apache project. So what. > > The biggest issue I have with SLF4J is figuring out the dependencies > that I need. I really detest having an API jar and then an > implementation/bridge jar. I find that too annoying.
+1 on that. Give me one jar. Convenience please. Gary > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- Thank you, Gary http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ http://garygregory.com/ http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ http://twitter.com/GaryGregory --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
