My thought is that there might be some java.util.logging helpers that could be written, and perhaps they might go in [lang] if there are 5 or fewer classes.
I assume that slf4j and log4j have their own j.u.logging connections, so that end is dealt with. The time of [logging] has probably passed. Stephen On 3 August 2011 06:50, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: >> Le 28/07/2011 22:01, Henri Yandell a écrit : >>> >>> Personally I'm happy for commons-logging to die. :) >> >> Yeah let's use java.util.logging instead :) > > Primarily that I don't get the feeling we have a major community of > developers on c-logging. We implemented it because we needed something > for our other components (though many simply chose not to log), but it > was never the passion of anybody here (hopefully not an incorrect > statement). Robert, Simon and others put in tons of good work, but I > feel that was duty not passion. > > So happy to see it die because it's something that's headed to > dormancy (be it stable or not). > > Hen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
