Commons Logging takes a least common denominator approach, which makes it useful for only fairly simple use cases. The goals for Log4J 2 are much more extensive than just a simple API that wraps other logging frameworks.
Ralph On Jul 29, 2011, at 6:19 AM, Paul Benedict wrote: > Would there be any merit in combining the log4j and commons logging > code? Given a hypothetical Log4j 2 and JCL 2, how much different could > they really be in terms of their goals and add-ins? > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Gilles Sadowski > <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: >> Hello. >> >>> I would have done that but some of the deficiencies are in the API and I >>> couldn't get Ceki to incorporate them. >> >> Do you have a pointer to a listing of those deficiencies? >> >>> [...] >> >> >> Thanks, >> Gilles >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
