Le 27/07/11 12:05, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
Hello.
I'm willing to help on this if you want.
What do you propose?
You mentioned the need for people to review/try the piece of code you've
posted. I haven't done yet, but I'm happy to.
As for japex being too heavy. I agree, I didn't realize it needed input
files, I thought only annotations were required. Also, although everyone
says that benchmarking must be done very carefully, I think that most
people do "quick and dirty" timing...
Having said that, well-formatted reports can be useful for starting a
discussion. But the class you propose is so concise that it probably
wins over japex and others...
Sebastien
Meanwhile, have you had a
look to existing frameworks, such as japex (http://japex.java.net/)?
[...]
I hadn't; I have now. It looks nice. I didn't think of something as
elaborate (charts, etc.) but rather a small utility for quick and dirty
micro-benchmarking ;-). Sometimes, one doesn't want to depend on heavy
tools like maven and/or xml input files and a browser to look at the
results...
I'm wondering whether we can be reasonably happy with the little code which
I've posted here.
I saw that there is a maven plugin; installing it (if others agree) might be
interesting in itself for when we would want to produce nice-looking reports.
[...]
Best,
Gilles
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
