Hi Gilles, ----- Mail original ----- > Hello. > > > > [...] > > > > > > The idea is to have "interleaved" calls to the candidate > > > implementations, so > > > that (hopefully) they will be penalized (or benefit) in the same > > > way > > > by what > > > the JVM is doing (GC or JIT compilation or ...) while the > > > benchmark > > > is > > > running. > > > > > > Does this make sense? > > > > Could it be merged by the FastMath performance tests Sebb set up ? > > I don't think so. If you meant rewriting the > "FastMathTestPerformance" tests > using the proposed utility, I don't think that it is necessary.
This was what I meant. If this feature is not used in any existing tests, perhaps it should go in some other directory. Perhaps a new "utilities" or something like that, at the same level as "main" and "test" ? Anyway, if you feel it's useful to have this available around, don't hesitate. best regards, Luc > If you meant something else, I didn't get it. :-} > > > Best, > Gilles > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
